This months Special Feature is titled "Secrets of the Lagoon" which is about the wonders being discovered in the largely unexplored territory of the extensive lagoons between the Great Barrier Reef and mainland Australia, and Marther gives a suggestion on how to check the accuracy of hydrometers.

Editorial

Sorry, nothing here this month. I thought I was organised, had it all done except this section. Then time slips away, we find a house to move to, and we move house. So have been rather busy. Next month I will fill you in on the details of once again moving OZ REEF. Damn I hope this does not happen every year ;-)

Thats all for this month. Catch ya,
DBW

Welcome OZ REEF's New Residents

No new residents this month.

Resident of the Month

Dear Marther ReefKeeper

Dear Marther,

I have recently become concerned about my hydrometer's accuracy. Especially since many people have been saying how inaccurate the floating arm type can be in some instances. Is there any way that I can calibrate or check the values that is is giving me?

From,
Sal Inety

Dear Sal,

Good to here that you are interested in checking the accuracy of your hydrometer. It is certainly something that people can tend to over look, and they rely on it being exact. Truth is that any measuring device is not 100% accurate, it is simply the nature of the manufacturing process of them and natural laws. Variations do occur and you cannot totally rely on one unit to give you the correct reading.

On top of that it is possible for the reading given by the hydrometer to drift with time, then the salinity of the system could be very different to what you think it is. It is possible to end up with a system running at say a 1.030 specific gravity, and then wonder why new livestock fail to acclimatise properly from the store systems which are run around the 1.022 mark. Not a situation you want to be in.

In pure water the hydrometer should give a specific gravity reading of 1.000 (ignoring temperature effects which are of minor concern with the ranges we deal in). If the hydrometer then reads low the reading given for saltwater will also read low by approximately the same amount. It could be possible the low reading is due to some calcium precipitation present on the needle or shaft of the hydrometer. If a low reading is found, then soak the hydrometer in some vinegar (a mild acid) which will then dissolve the calcium carbonate hopefully returning the hydrometer to the correct density. Rinse then retry.

There is also another couple of calibrations that you can do, with levels that are closer to the range typically encountered within the reef aquarium, so is much more reliable in telling you how accurate the hydrometer is. It simply involves making up a solution of salt and water, of which the specific gravity is know. You do need to be able to weight out the amount of salt accurately, as well as water volumes. Three such solutions are as follows:

• A good approximation is to use 35.1 grams of synthetic sea salt which is then added enough water to make up 1000 grams (1 kilogram) of solution. This will give a specific gravity of 1.026
• Using pure table salt, use 41 grams and make up to 1 litre. A solution of specfic gravity of 1.027 results. This is at a temperature of 25^oC, and if the temperature is significantly different to this then it will not have this specific gravity.
• Again, using table salt with 20.25 grams made up to 1 litre will give 1.0125.

From,
Marther ReefKeeper

Special Feature

Secrets of the Lagoon

by Katherine Johnson

Reprinted from CSIRO's science and environment magazine, ECOS.

The Remote Operated Vehicle (ROV) whirs along the seabed off far northern Queensland, relaying digital images to the research vessel 40 metres above.

Up in the wheelhouse, three marine scientists are stationed at a video monitor. As one drives the ROV, another records the data on a computer. A third notes other parts of the marine ecosystem as they come into view.

CSIRO Marine Research scientist Roland Pitcher makes notes from a video recorded by the ROV.

The scientists are 50 kilometres offshore, in an area known as the lagoon. Most people consider unremarkable this deeper water between the coast and the Barrier Reef, but after five years of research in the area, the scientists know better. For them it's no surprise when diverse gardens of marine life, soft corals, sponges, sea-whips and fish spring into view.

Gorgonians captured in the artificial light of the ROV. The light transforms the seabed, making visible reds and yellows not normally seen at depth. "Reds, oranges and yellows, are the first to be lost when you go underwater," Roland Pitcher says. "By 20 metres or so, everything, even brightly coloured fish, becomes bluey green."

"This is the first time that much of the Great Barrier Reef's inter-reef habitat has been comprehensively studied," says cruise leader Dr Roland Pitcher, of CSIRO Marine Research. "Most attention in the past has focussed on the highly photogenic coral reefs. The waters between the reefs are so unexplored that for some areas we have had to draw up our own navigation charts. While the lagoon and inter-reef habitats are mainly bare, muddy or sandy areas, people are often surprised to hear that there are also algal and seagrass meadows, highly diverse sponge and coral garden patches and deeper hard coral reefs."

A "large" sponge collected during experimental trawling.

Coral reefs make up about 6% of the 350,000km2 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). A further 70% consists of deeper waters between the reefs, and the lagoon. (Deep ocean waters outside the reefs account for the remaining 24%.)

Prawn trawling is the major fishing activity in the GBRMP. It occurs mostly in the lagoon and some inter-reef waters. Queensland's Fast Coast Prawn Trawl Fishery is the most important in the state, with an annual value of about $130 million. Some 800 trawlers are licensed to operate in the area. Many of them trawl in the Great Barrier Reef region.

Trawl grounds in the GBRMP cover 153,000 km2, but the intensity of trawling varies. About 27% of the lagoon and inter-reef seabed is not trawled at all, and of the seabed that is trawled, most of the trawl effort is concentrated in less than 20% of the area. About 70% of the trawled grounds have been trawled less than one pass per year since the fishery became established in the late 1960s.

In 1989, a scientific workshop on the effects of fishing in the GBRMP recommended investigating the environmental effects of prawn trawling. A lack of information about the park's trawled areas was making management difficult. The resulting study was conducted by CSIRO Marine Research and the Queensland Department of Primary Industries. It was the first to assess the environmental effects of prawn trawling in the tropics and the largest research project on the environmental effects of prawn trawling in the world.

A plate coral, one of the 1000 seabed species found in the study area, which indicated a high biological diversity.

Funding was provided by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA), the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, CSIRO and QDPI. Support also came from the fishing industry.

The research took place in a 10 000 km2 area of the far northern section of the park known as the Green Zone, which had been closed to trawling since 1985. Commercial trawling activities "'are simulated by conducting repeated trawls over an area of seabed. They showed that a single trawl had less impact than previously thought, but that there was a cumulative effect.

"Each pass of the trawl along the seabed removes about 5-25% of seabed life, while seven trawls over the same area of seabed remove about half of the seabed life, and 13 trawls remove 70-90% of seabed life," says CSJRO program leader, Dr Ian Poiner. "The research also showed that large sponges and flower-pot corals are susceptible to trawling, whereas species such as seawhips and gorgonians are more resistant," he says.

The scientists found that the effects of trawling depend not only on the amount of marine life removed, but also on the ability of marine communities to recover between trawls, and also on the distribution and intensity of prawn trawling in relation to the distribution and abundance of seabed life.

A soft coral pictured next to the cable that links the ROV to the mother ship. Occasionally, the ROV uses a robotic arm to attach a specimen with an electronic tag. The tag number is then linked to the digital image and the size and location of the specimen automatically recorded. Scientists can later return to the specimen and take new photograph, thereby determining its rate of growth. This can help them to determine how quickly a species will regenerate after disturbance.

"Recovery rates of seabed life are poorly known, but can be expected to range from one to 20 years depending on the species," Poiner says. "Continuing research in the area will monitor recovery and provide answers to this important question."

Bycatch was also investigated in the study. In the far northern GBRMP, for every tonne of prawns retained, about 6-10 tonnes of other species are discarded. That's about 2 kg of discards per hectare annually on trawled grounds. Most of the discards were fish and crustaceans, which were eaten rapidly either by seabirds or small sharks and fish.

The study found that populations of crested terns may have increased in response to the discarding of bycatch.

The study concluded that for most of the GBRMP, eliminating bycatch would have little impact on scavenging species. An exception is the crested tern, populations of which have doubled since trawling began in the late 1960s.

The research is of interest to fishers concerned about the possible impact of prawn trawling on fish populations. While adults and juveniles of recreationally and commercially important fish species were present in the study area, none of these fish were caught in the experimental prawn trawls.

Those involved in the management of trawling and concerned with its environmental effects in the region are considering the study.

Summaries of the report are available from Dr Phil Cadwallader, GBRMPA, P0 Box 1379, Townsville QLD 4810, (07) 47500812.

A means of mapping more territory

FOR marine scientists, Australia's 12 million square kilometre Exclusive Economic Zone represents a new frontier. Only 5% of its physical terrain (valleys, plains and mountains) and less than 2% of its marine habitat has been mapped.

Ocean mapping - surveying marine resources and their supporting habitats - is vital to sustainable ocean management, but with an ocean territory twice the size of Australia's landmass, where do you begin?

Scientists at CSIRO Marine Research believe the answer lies in a new "rapid mapping" system for ocean habitats.

The system simultaneously deploys towed video cameras, side-scan sonar, seabed dredges and sediment samplers from a research vessel, enabling information on continental shelf seabed habitats to be rapidly collected. Remote-operated vehicles can then be used for more detailed habitat investigation.

A typical habitat description includes maps of bathymetry, topography, sediment type, biological productivity, vegetation and seabed fauna density, and type and abundance of fish communities. More than a dozen such site descriptions can be achieved in a day, and an area as large as 10 000 km2 can be mapped in two to three weeks.

Using the system, CSIRO scientists have mapped 50,000 km2 of Torres Strait, 15,000 km2 of the Great Barrier Reef, 64,000 km2 of the North West Shelf and 30,000 km2 of the south-east Australian Continental Shelf.

You Wouldn't Believe It!

.... the task of establishing species, genera and families to corals through taxonomy does not end with corals that live now. The same system of classification must also incorporate fossils. The variability of skeletal structures seen in living coral speices presents the coral palaeontologist with difficult problems because a means of distinguishing true species characteristics from growth form variations is not always available. Things fair much better on the genera and family level.

.... 94-98% of all organic carbon processed by zooxanthellae leaks out of the algal cells to be used as a food source by the coral polyp.

Bereavement Notices

None this month to report.

Write Comment
Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article. Personal verbal attacks will be deleted. Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed. Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button. Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
Comment:
Code:*

Powered by AkoComment!